• spindles
  • textiles
  • works
  • research
  • blog
  • about
  • publications & resources

eine Saite

  • spindles
  • textiles
  • works
  • research
  • blog
  • about
  • publications & resources

toward textile literacy

Two of my handmade textiles - a warp-faced complementary warp pickup band on top of plain weave handspun plaid, both woven using backstrap loom and handspun yarn.

I know, it’s hard. It’s hard because we live in a world overcome by industry, which has taken many of us far away - the more industrialized, the further - from hands-on knowledge of how cloth and complex textiles are made. I don’t actually expect most people to understand terminology such as ‘warp-faced complementary warp pickup,’ or even ‘backstrap loom,’ but I still make note of it when showing my work, to specify the technique I used.

It’s similar to indicating whether a two-dimensional work on paper is a lithograph, an etching, a charcoal sketch, a monoprint, or a watercolor. These are all ways of making the thing, and it’s directly relevant to the artist and how they work. A watercolor painter won’t necessarily be able to create work using etching or printing techniques, and the work wouldn’t look the same if they did. The techniques are fundamentally different, and the art is expressed through the chosen medium, all of a piece.

mixed media, 2018 - sumi ink, acrylic, pastel and collage on paper

Likewise, when someone is a weaver, there’s a surprisingly wide range of techniques available, even if the medium is always tensioned yarn of some kind. The language available to us modern-day English speakers is limited and distorted by our lack of experience with making cloth. “Tapestry,” for example, is a mis-used word, perhaps most famously in reference to the Bayeux Tapestry, which is in fact an embroidered cloth. In common English usage, the word tapestry tends to refer to a textile that is hung on the wall, regardless of the technique used to make it.

plain weave strips of handspun cotton with wool stripes, being stitched together

Tapestry as a technique is exemplified by historical European wall coverings like the famous unicorn tapestries, by ‘flat-weave’ rugs such as Turkish kilim, and by artists such as Sarah Swett, Rebecca Mezoff, and Mary Zicafoose. Tapestry weaving is weft-faced, meaning the yarns you see are the weft yarns, covering the tensioned warp completely. Traditional Navajo rugs are also woven in this way, each row of weft yarn packed down tightly against the previous row, to form a smooth field of color. Contemporary artists of course muddy the waters for the layperson - for example Sarah Swett also indulges in backstrap-woven balanced plain weave, and Mary Zicafoose’s website offers hand-knotted carpets based on her tapestry weavings, produced in a workshop in Nepal. But the techniques are in every case noted alongside the textiles, so that you are never being misled by the artist. Textile artists tend to expend some effort (as I’m doing now) to explain how their work is made. This is not often expected of other artists, and I think we do it because our love makes us want to help people appreciate what’s going on with this stuff. That’s essentially the purpose of this website, to elucidate a few things about textiles.

more warp-faced complementary warp pickup, ‘loraypo’ pattern, using handspun wool

My work with the backstrap or body-tensioned loom - fundamentally some sticks and a belt around my body - tends toward the warp-faced, because this is what naturally happens when a warp is tensioned with the body: all the warp yarns crowd together closely. Traditional Andean designs take advantage of this, and use the warp yarns for patterning. Complementary warp pickup alternates warp yarn colors within a pair such that whatever is not up is down, and the pattern on the back of the weaving is the exact opposite of the front.

Bedouin style weaving in three panels, with supplementary warp patterning, made from handspun Navajo churro sheep’s wool

Another way to created warp-faced patterning is called supplementary warp, because an extra warp yarn is included, so that in each row you can choose which color to hold on top. The center pattern section of the weaving above, known as shajarah or sāhah in Arabia, has both dark and light warp yarns in each warp. The color that is not held to the front floats on the back.

weft float design based on Central Asian yurt band, using handspun wool

Okay one more, if you’re with me…. this is a warp float pattern commonly used among nomads of Central Asia and Iran. The warps are paired in two colors as with the Andean weaving, but in this case the pattern yarns are raised above everything, skipping or ‘floating’ over a row. The reverse side does not mirror the front in this case, but just looks like alternating stripes.

Bear in mind that each of these styles of patterning represents a different logic, a distinct way of thinking and of forming patterns. This effects what designs are possible within that logic, and it creates a kind of language and/or mathematics in the mind of the weavers who use these methods from a young age - their way of understanding is informed by their approach to weaving. This is where weaving becomes cosmic and mind-boggling for me.

plain weave black wool in progress

The other thing I do is plain weave. It has been a goal for some time to be able to weave balanced plain weave cloth, aka tabby, the basic over-under pattern that underlies what weaving fundamentally is, and create usable fabric, with my backstrap loom. I’ve written about this often, and have probably shared more images of work in progress than anyone needs to see, but there’s something enthralling about this view, the weaver’s perspective on the warp as it becomes cloth.

In order to really get warp and weft equally visible and ‘balanced’, I need to use a reed to hold the warp yarns in place. When I learned to make a bamboo reed from Bryan Whitehead in 2017 (two links because there were two posts about it,) this became a possibility for me, and I’ve been honing it ever since. Most of the cloth woven for my show earlier this year was plain weave, hung as ground behind lines of handspun yarn.

In hopes that this is more entertaining than pedantic, I’ve written this in order to elucidate some of the specifics of the weaver’s medium, and where my own work falls within the vast spectrum of weaving possibilities.

handwoven linen/cotton ground, handspun lambswool lines

tags: backstrap, backstraploom, weaving, handwoven, handspun, wool, andean, alsadu, bedouin, tapestry, textiles
Friday 12.16.22
Posted by Tracy Hudson
 

to the author of Fewer, Better Things

 I wanted to like this book. I saved the review from the paper, my interest piqued. I was counseled to read the book by The Craftsmanship Initiative, whose quarterly newsletter is full of good things. Focusing on craft skill is right up my alley, the banner under which I march, and so forth. But Glenn Adamson, you lost me at page forty, when you took the same old, well-worn trail of Western hegemonic educators everywhere and implied that backstrap weaving was some antiquated form, estimable but sadly handicapped by its too-human parameters.

This surprised me, given that I'd been reading about the value of ‘material intelligence’, the interactive relationship between person and materials as a two-way street of skills acquisition, the emphasis on using our bodies the way they were meant to be used in learning to work and make within this world. So many good moments and thoughts! But when you reached weaving, you dropped the ball. Let me explain. Here's the excerpt:          

"The most ancient forms of weaving had been done on standing frames or so-called 'backstrap looms,' in which the warp threads were anchored by the weaver's body. As she leaned back, the threads were put under tension.... This system can be used to make beautiful, though narrow, textiles -- only as wide as the weaver's body. The complexity is limited to what the weaver can accomplish by hand, picking up threads one or a few at a time, and also limited to what the weaver can either plan and remember, or improvise.

            By contrast, the industrial looms that preceded Jacquard's innovations were able to 'remember' twenty-four or so different patterns, any of which could be applied to a given pick. This permitted great variation but nothing compared to what Jacquard achieved."

-    Fewer, Better Things, p. 40

Past tense?

            By relegating backstrap weaving to the past, the author willfully ignores the bulk of handweaving expertise in the world today. By "bulk" I mean the sheer number of people who know how to do this thing, and are likely to practice it at some point in their lives, and/or to make use of the products of this weaving technique. And by "handweaving expertise" I mean the skill and knowledge that working with such a method requires, which is greater than that required for operating mechanized looms. Numerous and significant cultures maintain living, continuous backstrap weaving practices that have not been replaced by mechanization. Anyone who lives in or travels to Southeast Asia or South America (very broadly speaking - I could get more precise, and I have,) or even sees the photos of travelers, will likely encounter some manifestation of backstrap weaving. Certainly in many places the skills or prevalence of backstrap weaving is much reduced from past glory, but this is not because looms were invented that replicated the intricacy and complexity of the woven work. It is because the availability of cheaper cloth led to a devaluation of the handwoven, labor-intensive fabrics, and cultures have subsequently lost the ability to sustain the practice in the context of a global market economy.

Centro des Textiles Tradicionales del Cusco, Peru (Not my image) http://www.textilescusco.org/index.php/weaving-demonstrations/

Centro des Textiles Tradicionales del Cusco, Peru (Not my image) http://www.textilescusco.org/index.php/weaving-demonstrations/

Historical relevance

             In a Euro-centric narrative of weaving (which, if you’re building up to Jacquard, it is), tracing the origins to backstrap is erroneous, given that there is no evidence for this technique in Europe. Perhaps the term "standing frames" refers to warp-weighted looms, but the author skips over any elucidation of the term, in his eagerness to explain the limitations of backstrap weaving. Warp-weighted looms are in archaeological evidence throughout Europe[i], and can be more accurately considered as a practice of the past[ii], since this technology and its use in creating large-scale commercial cloth was replaced with increasingly mechanized looms. Current practice of warp-weighted weaving is more in the vein of revival, research, and historical re-enactment. Weavers using this practice as a tradition were "found" in the 1950's,[iii] but that very expression indicates that current practice is nowhere near the scale of backstrap weaving.

            Someone may be tempted to argue that it's difficult to find archaeological evidence of backstrap weaving, since the materials tend to be wood and thus decompose, so there is no way to know where such weaving was done in the past. But there is in fact evidence of backstrap loom use, such as bronze grave goods in southern China from the first millenium BCE, which are notably exactly the same as the loom parts currently in use in southern Laos and Hainan Island.[iv] In addition, research of archaeological textile fragments can reveal the type of loom used to create them[v], and extensive studies have been done on textiles found in Europe, none of which mention backstrap weaving as a technique.[vi]

My friend Keo, a Katu weaver from Salavan province, weaves on a loom with parts just like the ones excavated in Shizhaishan, China. My photo from 2013, Ock Pop Tok Living Crafts Center, Luang Prabang, Laos

My friend Keo, a Katu weaver from Salavan province, weaves on a loom with parts just like the ones excavated in Shizhaishan, China. My photo from 2013, Ock Pop Tok Living Crafts Center, Luang Prabang, Laos

Let’s talk limitations

With regard to the potential width of backstrap woven textiles, I would like to submit a simple fact and a few photos. At 18 inches wide, my hips are bigger than most of the traditional backstrap weavers I’ve known, and at the moment I have a 20 inch wide warp on the loom. It has taken me eight years to weave that wide, but that is a measure of my skills acquisition, not my body size. Weaving wide, as well as weaving long, or weaving complex patterns, or simply weaving at all on a backstrap loom requires an extensive skill set that is quite different from that of any type of weaving with a mechanized loom. The bodily control of tension, and the physical interaction with the warp yarns, differentiates this method in such a way that if Adamson had delved rather than dismissing it, he would have found a wealth of information to illustrate the very concepts in his book.

The photos below, which I collected online and did not take myself, should effectively disprove the notion of backstrap weaving being “as wide as the weaver’s body.” There are body-related limitations, of course: one has to be able to reach the edges, manipulate the heddles and sword beater, and maintain proper tension. But as these weavers show, with advanced skill the width of the fabric can be impressive.

Amuzgo weaver, Oaxaca, Mexico. Not my image http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Amuzgo_textiles

Amuzgo weaver, Oaxaca, Mexico. Not my image http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Amuzgo_textiles

Don Evaristo Borboa, master rebozo weaver of Mexico. http://oaxacaculture.com/2017/02/rebozo-weaving-technology-in-mexico-how-to-make-an-ikat-shawl/

Don Evaristo Borboa, master rebozo weaver of Mexico. http://oaxacaculture.com/2017/02/rebozo-weaving-technology-in-mexico-how-to-make-an-ikat-shawl/

Katu weaver in Salavan province, Laos. Foot-tensioned loom like Keo’s above. Image from Above the Fray: https://hilltribeart.com/loom-weaving-techniques

Katu weaver in Salavan province, Laos. Foot-tensioned loom like Keo’s above. Image from Above the Fray: https://hilltribeart.com/loom-weaving-techniques

Image by Paul Arps. Ikat weaving in Bena indigenous Ngada village (Flores, Indonesia 2016)https://www.flickr.com/photos/slapers/30039197170

Image by Paul Arps. Ikat weaving in Bena indigenous Ngada village (Flores, Indonesia 2016)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/slapers/30039197170

Moving on, we come to the limitation of what the weaver can "remember or improvise," which is contrasted with an impressive twenty-four or more patterns, beyond which the Jacquard loom enables the pattern to change with every pick (that is, every row.) Okay. First of all, how do we know how many patterns a lifelong weaver, in a continuous, centuries-old tradition, can remember or improvise? How do you even quantify patterns? If I agreed that they could be counted, I'd say twenty-four is a pittance compared to what the average Peruvian weaver carries in her mind and hands. If you're factoring in improvisation (which I would argue is always in play,) it becomes impossible to actually count patterns, because they shift incrementally, repeating and mirroring and flipping in various directions. [vii]

Secondly, what makes you think that backstrap weavers can't change patterns with every pick? Let us be clear: backstrap weavers can do anything they want, as long as they level up to the necessary skills. They can pick up every row by hand, they can install pattern heddles, and they can add supplementary threads as they go. The designs and patterning evolve within the weaving tradition, in accordance with the prevalent techniques, so there are things certain weavers tend to do or not do, based on the logic of their technical methods. But they can change patterns as much as they like, including ways that are impossible on a mechanized loom, such as the scaffold weaving, or discontinuous warps, of Pitumarca. Take a moment to contemplate the detail below, woven as a single piece on a backstrap loom.

Contemporary scaffold weave with pickup designs from Pitumarca, Peru. The different colors of warp in each stripe are interlaced on the loom, and the designs are picked up by hand in each row. (My photo, textile from private collection)

The statement contrasting the Jacquard achievements with the limitations of handweavers seems to fall into a post-industrial trap: that of equating the most complex with the pinnacle of achievement. Changing every color in every warp in every pick may maximize variability of design, but that’s not the same as achieving the peak of expressive and technical capability within the medium. Again, a strange angle to encounter in a book extolling craft skill.

©Wendy Garrity 2018. Detail of contemporary kushutara weaving from Bhutan. Supplementary weft technique, woven on a backstrap loom.

©Wendy Garrity 2018. Detail of contemporary kushutara weaving from Bhutan. Supplementary weft technique, woven on a backstrap loom.

Why get into it?

I'm addressing this because I come up against it repeatedly, in the world of museums and scholarly research into art, archaeology, technical skill, anthropology, etc. It seems that scholars using the example of weaving to support their argument believe that no one else could possibly know more than they do about the niche they are exploring, so if they can give the most rudimentary explanation of how a backstrap loom is operated, then they can speak with authority about the status of the craft historically. Or something. I mean, why else would you write a paragraph like that?

There's a built-in presumption that no one is going to call you out on the accuracy of your representation, and the only reason for this would be that it's not important enough for other scholars to care. And certainly no one at the level of your readers will know about backstrap weaving, because after all it's an obsolete practice. Which means the starting point is disdain for the position this craft skill holds in the world. Think about that. Like some 19th century anthropological diorama, backstrap weaving is only ever invoked to demonstrate why it fell by the wayside. Never mind that it hasn’t.

As a backstrap weaver with mentors all over the world, it gets under my skin. I've sat through graduate-level lectures where professors told me the history of spinning and weaving, always in the service of some other, grander purpose (such as museum studies or archaeology), usually riddled with errors, and never, ever conscious of the scope of traditional weaving going on in the world today. I have tried to address this omission in my master’s thesis, Encountering Woven Knowledge, and in essays such as Does the Ethnographic Textile Exist?

Perhaps the most maddening aspect is that pre-industrial textile methods can brilliantly illustrate most arguments that progressive academics might wish to make, if only they would look deeply and give it a chance. Communities of practice, body and mind integration, craft informing all realms of a culture, the intelligence embodied in making - these are important topics that need to be highlighted and written about, and which are amply illustrated by the ongoing, inimitable work of backstrap weaving in the world today.

I’m reading through to the end of the book, because I do believe in the overall agenda of promoting ‘material intelligence,’ living in touch with things, and generally paying attention. I refer you back to my favorite words on craft ever.

[i]  Barber EW. 1991 Prehistoric Textiles: The Development of Cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, with Special Reference to the Aegean, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. pp. 91-113

[ii] Susan T. Edmunds, Picturing Homeric Weaving, Center for Hellenic Studies, Harvard University:

https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/4365#noteref_n.45

[iii] What is a Warp-Weighted Loom? Textile Research Centre, Leiden:

https://trc-leiden.nl/trc-digital-exhibition/index.php/ancient-greek-loom-weights/item/132-4-what-is-a-warp-weighted-loom

 Hoffman, M. 1964. The Warp-Weighted Loom: Studies in the History and Technology of an Ancient Implement. Oslo (Reprinted, 1974, in the United States by Robin and Russ Handweavers). 

[iv] Vollmer JE. 1977 Archaeological and Ethnological Considerations of the Foot-Braced Body-Tension Loom. In: Gervers V (ed) Studies in Textile History. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum, 343-354.

Barber, 1991, p.81

UNESCO video: Traditional Li Textile Techniques https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI96KUULaBY

[v] Barber EW. 1991 Prehistoric Textiles: The Development of Cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, with Special Reference to the Aegean, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. pp. 143-144

[vi] Grömer, K. 2016 The Art of Prehistoric Textile Making: the development of craft traditions and clothing in Central Europe, Vienna: Natural History Museum Vienna.

[vii] Franquemont EM. 2004 Jazz, an Andean Sense of Symmetry. In: Washburn DK (ed) Embedded Symmetries, Natural and Cultural. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 81-94.

tags: decolonize, textiles, weaving, backstrap, craft, craftsmanship, making, handwoven
Saturday 03.30.19
Posted by Tracy Hudson
Comments: 6
 

collection of Leslie Grace, among other things

My own collection, in serendipitous layers: Chinchero chumpi on top of Japanese sakiori obi

One of the great things about being with Laverne for a few days was that we got to talk about weaving, ALL the TIME. We hardly stopped looking at textiles and discussing them - textiles we make, textiles we own or get to visit and touch, and those we only see in video. The conversation was constant and wide-ranging, as endless as our fascination for how woven things are made.  I pulled out so many things to show her that I kept seeing enticing new arrangements and juxtapositions among my own collection, as above. The textiles always want to converse with each other, too.

Luckily, a beautiful exhibition of pieces from the collection of Leslie Grace was still up at the Aljoya Thornton Place. This is where Leslie lives, and they hung gems from her collection throughout the lobby and hallways very nicely, with variable amounts of information. I don't know where to start or how to order things, so I will just follow our trail through the exhibit, more or less. Each piece was exquisite quality, drawing me in with its fine detail and workmanship. Some were familiar techniques and traditions, others completely unknown to me, like the North African headscarf resist-dyed with indigo and intricately embroidered. It is woven from handspun wool. How I would love to see the weaving method for this!

Tunisian wool resist-dyed head cloth, with embroidery.

Tunisian head cloth, detail

The image reminded my husband of Zanskari lingste, the dyed handwoven capes I collected in Ladakh, and there is a distinct resemblance.

From my collection, handwoven wool lingtse, or cape, from Zanskar, India

This bow-loom-like triangular loom, made from a single bent stick, was familiar to Laverne, because she had seen a similar piece in another collection (Ravelry link). The looms are used to weave plant fiber into wristlets that have something to do with archery (the information is thin on the ground in these collections.) The patterning sticks control which warp threads will be raised in each pick, and the weft is carried on a tiny shuttle. The weaving is a bit more than two inches wide. When finished, the fringe passes through the loops at the beginning, making an adjustable cuff.

Triangular frame loom  - Mayoruna people of lowland Peru

Finished cuff with fringe threaded through loops.

Another lowland Peru group (name and place unknown) was represented in the collection by beautiful, naturally colored cotton warp-faced plainweave with striped patterns. A photo showed them wearing long tunics, and on display were a bag and a flat cloth with incised bone decoration. We were both enthralled by the simple beauty of the stripes.

Detail of bone tassels and bag strap, handwoven cotton.

Bag detail, showing a cross knit looping edging around the top. Naturally colored cotton.

Below is another warp-faced plainweave garment, a tube skirt from Burma (Myanmar), embellished with supplementary weft patterning. I'd seen examples of this when I worked at an import store years ago.

Burmese sarong, handwoven cotton.

Our favorite display was the one used in the promotional photos for this exhibition: a sarong and jacket from Sumatra. It's also warp-faced, surely backstrap woven, and embroidered with extreme intricacy. The mirrors in the blue field are less than 1/4" across. The color combination is stunning, indigo against a deep, glowing gold.

It was striking to me how many of these pieces, from all over the world, were warp-faced backstrap weavings. Laverne and I could look at them and envision creating that structure ourselves, because it's the way we weave. I may not achieve the refinement of skill necessary in this lifetime, but I can relate to the weavings, and see how they've been made. These are all extreme detail shots, and I apologize for not showing the entire piece, but in this way you are looking the way we looked, as closely as possible.

Jacket detail, handwoven and embroidered in Sumatra, late 19th/early 20th century.

Finally, an extremely fine sarong from the Li people of Hainan Province, China, which is way out of my league for many lives to come. And yet, I'm familiar with the weaving technique. The Li weavers use foot-tensioned backstrap looms, similar to the Katu weavers in Laos. So we know this is also backstrap-woven, and it's made up of several narrow strips, less than 10" wide. The intricacy of the ikat and supplementary warp patterning is mind-boggling. A shot of the whole thing would have erased the detail, since this piece was not well lighted, so I took photos along the more visible edge. The colors are subtle, probably natural dye and probably faded. It's a wonderful work, as are all of the items in this collection. I'm so happy I got to see it, especially with a fellow weaver.

Detail of ikat panel, handwoven sarong from Li people of Hainan, China

Going around with Laverne was fun because neither of us had to explain the basics in order to convey our awe and admiration, as we might have with lay people who don't weave. We could simply say, "Wow, look at that ikat! Look at that twining!" etc. There was plenty to discuss, but we could start at a point of shared knowledge, and we both reveled in the presence of truly great textile work.

Another detail of the sarong, Hainan, China

tags: textiles, weaving, backstrap
Saturday 06.02.18
Posted by Tracy Hudson
 

Powered by Squarespace 6